I think it's pretty clear who we're skeptical and tired of, Mr. Fund.
Barrett in MN | Email | Homepage | 09.02.03 - 5:27 am | #

What do you expect of John Fund? He is a troll. Always has been. And the WSJ editorial page is the home of trolls.

This is pure disinformation. It is a fabrication. He has no evidence, and will bring none.

But it's a great example of the kind of lie right-wingers are telling right now. Which is, activists say they love Dean, but we'll tell them who to love -- they will love who we tell them to love so we can destroy them.

Fund knows Dean is the strongest candidate. He's the one pining for Hillary.
Dana Blankenhorn | Email | Homepage | 09.02.03 - 8:01 am | #

It seems to me that there are people reporting from an alternate universe (through a wormhole, perhaps). I will be quite happy to win in this universe.
Alan in CA | Email | Homepage | 09.02.03 - 10:06 am | #

What are you saying that the Wall Street Journal makes up (CENSORED) to fit their world view and puts it in their editoriral section?

After all this is the same editorial board that though Enron was a great company even as their investigators were woundering WHERE is the money?
Joe | Email | Homepage | 09.02.03 - 11:18 am | #

Boy, John Fund is in for the kind of shock we dems were in for in 1980. We all thought Reagan couldn't be nominated or win--we're where "movement conservatives" like Fund were back then. Finally ready fight hard and win the american people over to our side.
James Kennelly | Email | Homepage | 09.02.03 - 11:45 am | #

How many different ways can the WSJ think of to say the words "Red Herring"?
MurryMom | Email | Homepage | 09.02.03 - 1:09 pm | #

Please don' throw me in no briar patch!
ProudPatriot | Email | Homepage | 09.02.03 - 7:43 pm | #