Thanks for posting the link to the strib article: Dean excites New Hampshire like no one since, well, McCain.

-mandy in mpls


feel free to check "Daily Dean News" @ seattlefordean.com-It's usually up before 8am PST.


Journalists should be asking one question to all the Democrats bashing Howard Dean:

Who would you vote for in a Dean/Bush race in '04?


Click on my link to put into perspective of the whole Dean calling on Terry McAuliffe to seek order between the candidates "gaffe". It's been bothering me with the way media's been spinning it for the past week and I just realized why via the link.

Here's the quote from Terry earlier this year...

"We do not and I do not encourage any of our candidates to go after fellow Democrats," McAuliffe said. "I want to discourage it early on. ... We expect all of them to abide by a good code out there to make sure the focus is on George Bush and not on each other."

...I'd like to know what he deems good code?


Dean's "gaffes" are nothing close to the stunners that Reagan came out with in 1980 and he did ok.

More importantly, the issue comes back to 'let Dean be Dean.' Either he says what he's said/will say, or he becomes another run-of-the-mill candidate who vets every statement 5 times before he makes it. Please continue to keep the muzzle off and continue to 'let Dean be Dean.'


From the SC link:

"...about two dozen sign-toting Dean supporters crashed an event hosted by Gephardt, crowding his car as he arrived at Hesser College in Manchester."

We should not be doing this. I'm not saying talk nice, not at all, Gephardt is a slug for his distortions and yes, slam him hard, but stay out of the other guy's events.


NADER will run again.