your link doesn't work. Here's the correct one http://www.whatthenationthinks.com/
Thanks. Try again and see if it works now.
Off topic: Finally a good article that expresses many of the things that irritate me about John Kerry.
"If Kerry doesn't need to be lectured on the military by Howard Dean, do the rest of us need to be lectured by this sponge on how much we should be willing to pay in taxes?"
AMERICAN WOMEN TO KERRY: WE DON'T THINK YOU'RE SO HOT
http://story.news.yahoo.com/
news...k_you_re_so_hot
Though I am not a woman, I fully concur!
Ah, dude, Shawn that article is from Reich-wingnut pundit Ann Coutair who is a total bitch. Don't listen to her, you want to hear from a real, straight woman thinks about Kerry feel from to ask any of the woman who tromps along this website.
As for this female-what do I think of Howard Dean-he is one studly, intelligent guy (dispite him being way older than me but hey if I think David Duchovny or Harrison Ford or even Bill Clinton is hot why can't I think the same for this Demo pundit). Hey how can a girl (like me for example) not get all warm and fuzzy from that big grin of his. :P
Have a great evening-and I'm missing the Daily Show. Dang!
That poll told me I had voted already! Grr...
I'm not a fan of the author of the article. I just liked a lot of what she was saying. I respect Senator Kerry and what he has done, but I deeply resent him implying that only those who have served in the military have the credentials to be president. It was the only article I have come across that has attacked him, outside of a mild side note, on this at all.
Ann Coulter is a Republican hit woman and a total fraud. There is not a single reason she should be read by anyone with an IQ of at least 90.
Notice how the right is taking hits at the legitimate Dem candidates 10 months before there is a winner. Kerry may have his own troubles but Ann Hot-air isn't anyone worthy of telling you this.
Ok, I have a question.
Since when does anyone read opinion articles to be told what to think?
Just because I agree on a point of her's that does not mean I agree with all that she is, does, has done, or will ever do. Why do people judge my posts more on who wrote the article than what it said?
I'm really not trying to start any fights, insult anyone, or anything like that. I am honestly confused and frustrated by this.
Why is it so important that she is a " Reich-wingnut pundit" if she says something that I see as true and believed before?
Can not an idiot be right once in awhile?
Why is the messanger more important or more interesting than the message?
Thanks for your comments.
okay, yes, fun... but meaningless 
URL:
http://www.whatthenationthinks.c....asp?
PollID=885
I agree, it was fun but meaningless.
BTW, Dean at 55% now.